Ron Paul on why Obama was wrong to order the drone strike on Awlaki

Ron Paul has denounced President Obama today over what he called the “assassination” in Yemen of U.S.-born Al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is said to have played a major role in motivating and recruiting prospective Al Qaeda affiliates:

“I don’t think that’s a good way to deal with our problems,” Paul told MSNBC this morning. “Al-Awlaki was born here; he is an American citizen. He was never tried or charged for any crimes. No one knows if he killed anybody. We know he might have been associated with the underwear bomber. But if the American people accept this blindly and casually that we now have an accepted practice of the president assassinating people who he thinks are bad guys, I think it’s sad.”

Ron Paul, who holds some kooky positions on economic issues, makes a good point. It’s great that Awlaki can no longer foment hostilities against the United States. What’s disappointing is the disrespect President Obama has shown for the rule of law in achieving this. It would not have been difficult to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to say that a U.S. citizen who serves in a terrorist organization engaged in hostilities against the United States forfeits his citizenship. It would not have been difficult for Obama to make a presidential finding that Awlaki met these requirements and posed a serious threat. But these steps were not taken, making this a pretty clear case of the President depriving a U.S. citizen of life without due process of law — something the Fifth Amendment expressly forbids.

Advertisements

About Guy N. Texas

Guy N. Texas is the pen name of a lawyer living in Dallas, who is now a liberal. He was once conservative, but this word has so morphed in meaning that he can no longer call himself that in good conscience. Guy has no political aspirations. He speaks only for himself.
This entry was posted in Constitution, Criminal Justice, Foreign affairs, News. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Ron Paul on why Obama was wrong to order the drone strike on Awlaki

  1. hortonw says:

    Why does his citizenship matter? If an American citizen and a visiting Brit both commit murder in the US, should we give the Brit less due process en route to the death penalty? That can’t be right.

    If the exigencies of the threat were sufficiently grave to warrant killing A-A, why would we choose a different course because he’s a citizen? Under what circumstances would someone deserve to be killed as a foreigner but not deserve death as a US citizen? I don’t see that distinction. We may have a greater obligation to save our citizens when they are in danger but when it comes to killing people we all have the same right not to be killed except when absolutely necessary. The problem here is not that we killed a citizen, it’s that we killed someone who posed a threat that was not quite grave enough.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s