Jonathan Chait confirms the President’s political calculation to ignore the left and lurch right.

Jonathan Chait argues that, given the President’s earlier blunder of failing to  condition his willingness to extend the Bush tax cuts on raising the debt ceiling, the deal that emerged was “about as non-bad as it could have gotten.” Perhaps so. But this paragraph is the one that sticks out:

Furthermore, unlike many other liberals, I agree with a key element of the administration’s political calculation. The thinking is that Obama lost the support of a key centrist element of his coalition due to the perception that he’s an out-of-control spender who created big deficits. The perception is wrong, but that doesn’t really matter. Signing onto a major deficit reduction deal helps rebuild Obama’s image. That the deal consists entirely of spending cuts probably only helps. What’s more, recognizing that Democrats will never obtain a fiscal readjustment entirely on their own terms, I’m willing to swallow some cuts to Medicare and Social Security in the pursuit of deficit control.

Two things: First, Chait is saying that the President’s bargaining position (seeking huge spending cuts, but little additional revenue) was an intentional political calculation designed to tack right. More evidence for this has been highlighted in prior posts. Second, from a policy standpoint, Chait’s piece (as well as the President’s position) is economically clueless. Does Chait not understand that government spending always increases dramatically in economic downturns, that the longer and deeper the downturn, the more red ink flows, and that this is due largely to “automatic stablizers” like unemployment insurance, Medicaid, “welfare,” etc.? Does he not get that these programs shorten recessions, such that, over the longer run government coffers will have more net revenue in them if such programs are protected? Does he not understand that, in the current climate — where aggressive stimulus is not being seriously considered by anyone in power — these programs are what is keeping our economy from falling into the sea?


About Guy N. Texas

Guy N. Texas is the pen name of a lawyer living in Dallas, who is now a liberal. He was once conservative, but this word has so morphed in meaning that he can no longer call himself that in good conscience. Guy has no political aspirations. He speaks only for himself.
This entry was posted in Economic policy, Politics, Presidential rhetoric. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Jonathan Chait confirms the President’s political calculation to ignore the left and lurch right.

  1. Stevie says:


    I totally get what you’re talkiing about. I work at a public mental health center in San Francisco. As the economy has contracted the past few years, we’ve had rounds of layoffs, lots of program closures and furloughs. This at a time when like never before demand for services has increased dramatically. We’re just as likely to see out-of-work-uninsured architects, nurses and hotel managers these days as homeless mentally ill substance users, our more traditional clientele. Government is the “safety net” for a weak sluggish economy. Too bad politicians are only really attuned to employed, upper-middle class and rich voters with money on hand to give.

    (PS I think that some of your links didn’t take)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s